On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 26.02.15 at 18:53, <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > > Or maybe we just need to change the libxl_set_memory_target call to use > > an absolute memory target to avoid restricting dom0 memory more than > > necessary at each iteration. Also increasing the timeout argument passed > > to the libxl_wait_for_free_memory call could help. > > Wouldn't that lead to problems with multiple racing invocations of > that function (perhaps from different processes)? (Note that I ask > this without knowledge on whether libxl already suitably serializes > things.)
Calls to freemem are serialized using a lockfile. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
