>>> On 26.02.15 at 18:53, <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > Or maybe we just need to change the libxl_set_memory_target call to use > an absolute memory target to avoid restricting dom0 memory more than > necessary at each iteration. Also increasing the timeout argument passed > to the libxl_wait_for_free_memory call could help.
Wouldn't that lead to problems with multiple racing invocations of that function (perhaps from different processes)? (Note that I ask this without knowledge on whether libxl already suitably serializes things.) Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
