On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 00:47 -0500, Meng Xu wrote:

> 2015-02-26 8:37 GMT-05:00 Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>:
>         and update them from Credit2 and RTDS schedulers.
>         
>         Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>
>         Cc: Meng Xu <xumengpa...@gmail.com>
>         Cc: George Dunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com>
>         Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
>         Cc: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org>
>         ---
>          xen/common/sched_credit2.c   |    2 ++
>          xen/common/sched_rt.c        |    2 ++
>          xen/include/xen/perfc_defn.h |    4 ++--
>          3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> ​The change for RTDS scheduler looks good to me.
>
Does this count as a "Reviewed-by: Meng Xu <men...@cis.upenn.edu>" ?

Also, if yes, does it also apply to patch #2 ? That is unclear as
sched_rt.c is modified in patches #1, #2 ad #3, while what you did is:
 - you explicitly provided the tag for patch #1
 - you said "looks good" for this for patch #3
 - you said nothing for patch #2

The bottom line of all this being: with Ack-s/Reviewed-by-s, it's always
better be pretty explicit! :-D

Thanks and Regards,
Dario

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to