>>> On 26.02.15 at 14:37, <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote: > --- a/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > +++ b/xen/common/sched_credit2.c > @@ -571,9 +571,11 @@ tickle: > (unsigned char *)&d); > } > cpumask_set_cpu(ipid, &rqd->tickled); > + SCHED_STAT_CRANK(tickle_idlers_some); > cpu_raise_softirq(ipid, SCHEDULE_SOFTIRQ); > > no_tickle: > + SCHED_STAT_CRANK(tickle_idlers_none); > return; > }
Isn't there a return statement missing ahead of "no_tickle:" now? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
