Il 24/Feb/2015 16:24 "Ian Campbell" <ian.campb...@citrix.com> ha scritto: > > On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 14:19 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > Hi Frediano, > > > > On 20/02/15 09:56, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > This name can appear in some Linux kernel repos. Not very fortunate, > > > but to avoid others spending an hour to spot that few characters > > > difference it worth to work around it. > > > > As Zoltan said on a previous mail [1], this is only used on your > > internal kernel. > > > > Furthermore, as the bindings is not official, nothing prevent someone to > > re-use the bindings for another purpose (such as GICv3 on hisilicon). > > > > Xen upstream aims to support only official bindings for a this reason. > > So I don't think we should take this patch. > > Neither do I. Nacked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>. > > If/when these bindings are described in the official bindings document > then please let us know. > > Ian. >
I currently ack the nack. As this dtb is only used by xen just updating it make everybody happy. Dom0 and other domains will use standard gic Frediano
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
