On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 14:19 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Frediano, > > On 20/02/15 09:56, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > This name can appear in some Linux kernel repos. Not very fortunate, > > but to avoid others spending an hour to spot that few characters > > difference it worth to work around it. > > As Zoltan said on a previous mail [1], this is only used on your > internal kernel. > > Furthermore, as the bindings is not official, nothing prevent someone to > re-use the bindings for another purpose (such as GICv3 on hisilicon). > > Xen upstream aims to support only official bindings for a this reason. > So I don't think we should take this patch.
Neither do I. Nacked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>. If/when these bindings are described in the official bindings document then please let us know. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
