On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 09:33 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 20.02.15 at 17:53, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Jan, do you have any feeling for how this is going to play out on x86
> > with the vapic stuff?
>
> The vapic logic shouldn't require any physdevop involvement, so if
> I read right what you propose (not having such a requirement /
> connection on ARM) either, I agree that a new domctl should be all
> that's needed (if XEN_DOMCTL_{,un}bind_pt_irq can't be re-used).
Actually, I think bind_pt_irq with a new PT_IRQ_TYPE_* would be a good
option.
An ARM SPI is a bit like an ISA IRQ, but not close enough to reuse IMHO
(and the datatype would need widening).
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
