>>> On 20.02.15 at 17:53, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Jan, do you have any feeling for how this is going to play out on x86
> with the vapic stuff?

The vapic logic shouldn't require any physdevop involvement, so if
I read right what you propose (not having such a requirement /
connection on ARM) either, I agree that a new domctl should be all
that's needed (if XEN_DOMCTL_{,un}bind_pt_irq can't be re-used).

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to