>>> On 20.02.15 at 17:53, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > Jan, do you have any feeling for how this is going to play out on x86 > with the vapic stuff?
The vapic logic shouldn't require any physdevop involvement, so if I read right what you propose (not having such a requirement / connection on ARM) either, I agree that a new domctl should be all that's needed (if XEN_DOMCTL_{,un}bind_pt_irq can't be re-used). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel