>>> On 12.05.17 at 19:35, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/string.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/string.h
> @@ -2,13 +2,23 @@
>  #define __X86_STRING_H__
>  
>  #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMCPY
> -#define memcpy(t,f,n) (__builtin_memcpy((t),(f),(n)))
> +void *memcpy(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
> +#define memcpy(d, s, n) __builtin_memcpy(d, s, n)
>  
> -/* Some versions of gcc don't have this builtin. It's non-critical anyway. */
>  #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMMOVE
> -extern void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
> +void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
> +#define memmove(d, s, n) __builtin_memmove(d, s, n)
>  
>  #define __HAVE_ARCH_MEMSET
> -#define memset(s,c,n) (__builtin_memset((s),(c),(n)))
> +void *memset(void *dest, int c, size_t n);
> +#define memset(s, c, n) __builtin_memset(s, c, n)

Now that xen/string.h has the exact same declarations and
definitions already, why don't you simply delete the overrides
from here?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to