>>> On 12.05.17 at 19:35, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote:
> * Drop __kernel_size_t entirely.  It isn't useful distinction, especially as
>    it means the the prototypes don't appear to match their common definitions.
>  * Introduce __HAVE_ARCH_* guards for strpbrk(), strsep() and strspn(), which
>    match their implementation in common/string.c
>  * Apply consistent Xen style throughout.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>

Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to