>>> On 12.05.17 at 19:35, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: > * Drop __kernel_size_t entirely. It isn't useful distinction, especially as > it means the the prototypes don't appear to match their common definitions. > * Introduce __HAVE_ARCH_* guards for strpbrk(), strsep() and strspn(), which > match their implementation in common/string.c > * Apply consistent Xen style throughout. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel