On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:49:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 17.04.17 at 21:09, <eric.devol...@oracle.com> wrote: > > The spinlock in kexec_swap_images() was removed as > > this function is only reachable on the kexec hypercall, which is > > now protected at the top-level in do_kexec_op_internal(), > > thus the local spinlock is no longer necessary. > > But perhaps leave an ASSERT() there, making sure the in-hypercall > flag is set?
I am not sure why but if at all I think that we should also consider other key kexec functions then. Or put ASSERT() into do_kexec_op_internal() just before "switch ( op )". Daniel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
