On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:32:06AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 12.04.17 at 04:41, <chao....@intel.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:57:23AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 12.04.17 at 02:04, <chao....@intel.com> wrote: >>>> + * If a caller want an atomic update from the views of VT-d >>> >>>wants >>> >>>Also what do you mean by "from the views of VT-d"? >> >> OK. will fix this too. Do you mean it is (and should be) atomic from >> software's view >> , so these words are redundant. > >I don't mean anything here until I understand what you mean. >
I think making this update presented to VT-d hardware as an atomic update is this function's goal. Is that right? That's why I said "from the views fo VT-d". Thanks Chao _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
