>>> On 09.02.15 at 19:53, <tamas.leng...@zentific.com> wrote:
> ---
> v4: Style fixes

But why did you not do all of them then?

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_paging.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_paging.c
> @@ -25,31 +25,29 @@
>  #include <xen/mem_event.h>
>  
>  
> -int mem_paging_memop(struct domain *d, xen_mem_event_op_t *mec)
> +int mem_paging_memop(struct domain *d, xen_mem_paging_op_t *mpc)
>  {
>      if ( unlikely(!d->mem_event->paging.ring_page) )
>          return -ENODEV;
>  
> -    switch( mec->op )
> +    switch( mpc->op )
>      {
>      case XENMEM_paging_op_nominate:
>      {
> -        unsigned long gfn = mec->gfn;
> -        return p2m_mem_paging_nominate(d, gfn);
> +        return p2m_mem_paging_nominate(d, mpc->gfn);
>      }
>      break;

I'm relatively certain I said this before: The braces now become
pointless and hence should be dropped.

Again for the parts this is applicable to,
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
provided the above gets adjusted throughout.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to