Hi Kevin, At 14:09 +0100 on 11 Dec (1418303386), Tim Deegan wrote: > At 02:03 +0000 on 11 Dec (1418259797), Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > From: Tim Deegan [mailto:t...@xen.org] > > > Now since the code's not going to be in 4.5 anyway, it should be > > > possible to _develop_ it in this manner, possibly in a private branch, > > > even if the early stages aren't getting applied immediately. We > > > should be able to set up an rmrr branch on the public servers if that > > > helps. But again, that relies on having a design worked out in > > > advance that both developers and maintainers are (within reason) > > > committed to. > > > > that's a good suggestion. We'll send out a design review today, and then > > based on discussion we can see whether making sense to do such > > incremental way. > > Sounds good!
I haven't seen this design doc yet -- if I missed it can someone point me to it? Cheers, Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
