Joe,
Do actually want people to turn the dial? How arcane is that?
Jim KC7QY
On Friday, July 9, 2021, 12:02:36 PM MDT, Joe Taylor <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi Al,
As Bill has explained, the WSJT-X Rx bandwidth is currently limited to
5000 Hz. But I agree that larger FT8 sub-bands (or multiple sub-bands
on a given HF band) are really what is required to relieve congestion.
-- 73, Joe, K1JT
On 7/9/2021 11:54 AM, Al Pawlowski wrote:
> Given FT8’s growth, a built-in way to ask for a jump to an clear frequency,
> or channel, certainly seems like a good idea. However, a larger channel is
> what really seems to be needed. This could be accomplished (other mode user
> squawks not considered) by just setting the WSJTx, and radio, rx bandwidths
> higher. With my setup, I can work up to a 4500Hz FT8 channel. If more users
> were to use larger BW, it might be a significant congestion relief.
>
> Though my rig can go to 9999Hz rx BW and WSJTx v2.4.0 set to 6000Hz, 4500kHz
> is all I can get - above that, decodes stop and the waterfall fills with
> noise. I wonder if the limit is due to my CPU speed (usage increases with BW
> and channel activity) or a WSJTx thing. Reports from others doing larger BW
> would be interesting.
>
>
> Al Pawlowski, K6AVP
> Los Osos, CA USA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
