Julien PUYDT wrote: > Kyle a écrit : >> Of course, it would be much nicer is if libxml++ didn't have such a >> heavy dependency on glibmm just for ustring's. > > Is libxml++ that interesting when compared to directly using libxml2 ? > > Snark > After a quick glance through the libxml2 api, it certainly seems doable to switch to libxml2 directly. Though considering all the places that libxml++ is used in the code, it would not be trivial. Throughout the code xml objects are passed around, to remove these objects and replace them with C code would be a pain. See the LoadXml functions in the weapons or objects for examples of this.
Of course, another possible alternative is to embed the ustring class itself into libxml++, and distribute our own version of that / ask the maintainers to do this too. I suspect that this won't fly though. kyle _______________________________________________ Wormux-dev mailing list Wormux-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wormux-dev
