On 08/04/2010 05:37 PM, Wilson, Phil wrote:
> The log shows that there's a per-user scenario involved - there's no reason
> to believe that the log is lying. This is very explicit:
I do not doubt that - just trying to figure out if its the new installer
that is broke or the old one.
One final thing, just to make sure that i have understood this correctly:
>
> MSI (s) (78:4C) [20:14:06:555]: FindRelatedProducts: current install is
> per-user. Related install for product
> '{A70E99ED-87C6-4142-88A7-8491459494A2}' is per-machine. Skipping...
In the above log entry, current install refers to what is already
installed (0.3.0) and related install refers to the new install (0.5.0).
Is that correct?
>
> Now maybe you can't reproduce this any more, but given that concrete evidence
> there's not much more anyone can add. And it's true that cross-context
> upgrades can't be done.
>
> Phil Wilson
>
Thx
Luk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
WiX-users mailing list
WiX-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wix-users
