Hi,
A minimal mingw build (slightly outdated compiler version, not 64bit) is
part of our test build setup. So I would expect not too much problems.
BR,
Wim.
2014-11-09 0:00 GMT+01:00 K. Frank <kfrank2...@gmail.com>:
> Hello Lists!
>
> How practical is it to use Wt with mingw-w64? Are there pre-built Wt
> binaries for a recent mingw-w64 toolchain? Would I expect the build
> process to be reasonably smooth if I try to build Wt myself?
>
> I see reference to mingw-w64 on the Wt wiki:
>
> http://redmine.webtoolkit.eu/projects/wt/wiki/Installing_Wt_on_MinGW
>
> It talks primarily about the TDM toolchain. Also, it references gcc 4.7.1
> and boost 1.5.2, so I'm guessing that the wiki entry is a couple of years
> old. All it says about mingw-w64 (or more specifically, "mingwbuild") is
> that you have to "[work] around some compilation/linking issues."
>
> There are some comments about mingw-w64 in the mail archive for this
> list, but they are mostly about (unsolved) problems.
>
> Is Wt likely to work with mingw-w64, or would I be asking for trouble to
> try it?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> K. Frank
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> witty-interest mailing list
> witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
witty-interest mailing list
witty-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/witty-interest
