that capture is just udp without decoding to RTP..

On 06/03/2008, Fabiana moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> the first post was when i already had decoded udp data into rtp...
> here's my capture
>
> On 06/03/2008, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Its in Edit | Preferences | Protocols | RTP | 'Try to decode RTP outside
> > of a conversation'.
> >
> > Reading your very first post, however, shows that you've already seen
> > these decoded as RTP...  Can you post a UDP capture?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Fabiana moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > no i havent done so....where is the rtp dissector preferences???
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On 06/03/2008, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Did you turn on the RTP heuristic dissector in the RTP dissector
> > > > preferences?
> > > >
> > > > Could you possibly send a capture file?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Fabiana moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey Martin i configured my client to listen to port 7070(udp)
> > > > > So, now in my captures i just see udp packets..that's fine
> > > > > But when i try to decode to rtp...there's the same error...
> > > > > i should be able to decode udp to rtp smoothly right?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 06/03/2008, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes, but have you tried to configure preferences in the RTSP
> > > > > > client or server to encourage it to use RTP over UDP instead (the 
> > > > > > RTSP
> > > > > > protocol allows this).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Fabiana moreno <
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > That´s is the thing... i am not seeing any udp packets in my
> > > > > > > capture. just tcp and rtsp.
> > > > > > > Attached are the capture files(one .pcap and the other in text
> > > > > > > form) that includes RTSP signalling
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 06/03/2008, Martin Mathieson <
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could you possibly post a capture file that includes the
> > > > > > > > RTSP signalling?
> > > > > > > > We should be configuring the RTP stream with the dynamic
> > > > > > > > payload type so that it can be displayed properly...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Fabiana moreno <
> > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Well it's my final year project and i need to analyse the
> > > > > > > > > QoS parameters when streaming over wireless lan.
> > > > > > > > > I'm streaming an mpeg4 video from a server to my client
> > > > > > > > > (the last one is the one where wireshark is installed)
> > > > > > > > > So im trying to to capture all the packets im getting when
> > > > > > > > > streaming.
> > > > > > > > > My server supports rtcp/rtp and i think (correct me if im
> > > > > > > > > wrong) that the best way to analyse all these packets are to 
> > > > > > > > > decode them to
> > > > > > > > > udp and then to rtp but im getting the problem mentioned 
> > > > > > > > > before.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But is there some way i can fix this?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >   On 05/03/2008, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Well, I dont' really understand what you do, but the
> > > > > > > > > > PT=unknown is from the
> > > > > > > > > > fact that this packet type is dynamically assigned,
> > > > > > > > > > negotiated between
> > > > > > > > > > parties. If Wireshark doesn't see the negotiations, it
> > > > > > > > > > can't make out which
> > > > > > > > > > codec goes with PT 96. So yes, it can happen you see
> > > > > > > > > > this.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanx,
> > > > > > > > > > Jaap
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Fabiana moreno wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > hello!!!
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm streaming an mpeg4 video with darwin streamer
> > > > > > > > > > server trhough my
> > > > > > > > > > > WLAN. I'm using wireshark to analyse the packets im
> > > > > > > > > > receiving.
> > > > > > > > > > > I see TCP/RTSP packets but when i decode to UDP and
> > > > > > > > > > then to RTP to
> > > > > > > > > > > anlyse it, wireshark shows the following in all the
> > > > > > > > > > packets, here a sample:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > 34    0.253327    192.168.123.100 <
> > > > > > > > > > http://192.168.123.100/>
> > > > > > > > > > > 192.168.123.101 <http://192.168.123.101/>    RTP    
> > > > > > > > > > > PT=Unknown
> > > > > > > > > > (96),
> > > > > > > > > > > SSRC=0x4B6C00C, Seq=65416, Time=1531529067
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > is this what i suppose to see? any suggestions in how
> > > > > > > > > > to analyse packets
> > > > > > > > > > > im receiving while streaming? please help!! im new
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to