no i havent done so....where is the rtp dissector preferences???
thanks

On 06/03/2008, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did you turn on the RTP heuristic dissector in the RTP dissector
> preferences?
>
> Could you possibly send a capture file?
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Fabiana moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hey Martin i configured my client to listen to port 7070(udp)
> > So, now in my captures i just see udp packets..that's fine
> > But when i try to decode to rtp...there's the same error...
> > i should be able to decode udp to rtp smoothly right?
> >
> >
> > On 06/03/2008, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes, but have you tried to configure preferences in the RTSP client or
> > > server to encourage it to use RTP over UDP instead (the RTSP protocol 
> > > allows
> > > this).
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Fabiana moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > That´s is the thing... i am not seeing any udp packets in my
> > > > capture. just tcp and rtsp.
> > > > Attached are the capture files(one .pcap and the other in text form)
> > > > that includes RTSP signalling
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 06/03/2008, Martin Mathieson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Could you possibly post a capture file that includes the RTSP
> > > > > signalling?
> > > > > We should be configuring the RTP stream with the dynamic payload
> > > > > type so that it can be displayed properly...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Fabiana moreno <
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Well it's my final year project and i need to analyse the QoS
> > > > > > parameters when streaming over wireless lan.
> > > > > > I'm streaming an mpeg4 video from a server to my client (the
> > > > > > last one is the one where wireshark is installed)
> > > > > > So im trying to to capture all the packets im getting when
> > > > > > streaming.
> > > > > > My server supports rtcp/rtp and i think (correct me if im wrong)
> > > > > > that the best way to analyse all these packets are to decode them 
> > > > > > to udp and
> > > > > > then to rtp but im getting the problem mentioned before.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But is there some way i can fix this?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 05/03/2008, Jaap Keuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, I dont' really understand what you do, but the
> > > > > > > PT=unknown is from the
> > > > > > > fact that this packet type is dynamically assigned, negotiated
> > > > > > > between
> > > > > > > parties. If Wireshark doesn't see the negotiations, it can't
> > > > > > > make out which
> > > > > > > codec goes with PT 96. So yes, it can happen you see this.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanx,
> > > > > > > Jaap
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fabiana moreno wrote:
> > > > > > > > hello!!!
> > > > > > > > I'm streaming an mpeg4 video with darwin streamer server
> > > > > > > trhough my
> > > > > > > > WLAN. I'm using wireshark to analyse the packets im
> > > > > > > receiving.
> > > > > > > > I see TCP/RTSP packets but when i decode to UDP and then to
> > > > > > > RTP to
> > > > > > > > anlyse it, wireshark shows the following in all the packets,
> > > > > > > here a sample:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 34    0.253327    192.168.123.100 <http://192.168.123.100/>
> > > > > > > > 192.168.123.101 <http://192.168.123.101/>    RTP    PT=Unknown
> > > > > > > (96),
> > > > > > > > SSRC=0x4B6C00C, Seq=65416, Time=1531529067
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > is this what i suppose to see? any suggestions in how to
> > > > > > > analyse packets
> > > > > > > > im receiving while streaming? please help!! im new
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > > > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-users mailing list
> > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-users mailing list
> Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-users mailing list
Wireshark-users@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users

Reply via email to