Michael Tuexen wrote: > On Feb 28, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: >> >> Guy Harris wrote: >>> bitmus DA wrote: >>> >>>> i waited and downloaded version 0.99.8 >>>> then configured it --without-pcap and compiled. but error still here >>> That's another bug, not fixed in 0.99.8, but fixed in the current >>> SVN, >>> so that *particular* fix should be in the next release. >>> >>> For better or worse, most developers don't build without libpcap, and >>> the buildbots don't build without libpcap, so build problems when >>> building without libpcap don't tend to get discovered and fixed. >>> >>> Obviously, we don't want all the buildbots building *only* without >>> libpcap. >>> >>> We could perhaps do all builds first with, and then without, >>> libpcap - >>> or first without, and then with, libpcap, with post-build tests >>> done on >>> the versions with libpcap - although that would slow the buildbots >>> down >>> somewhat. >>> >>> The Solaris buildbot appears to have taken about 4 3/4 minutes to run >>> the configure script, and about 1 hour 38 minutes to do the build, >>> unless I'm missing something, so it'd add about 1 3/4 hours to the >>> Solaris build procedure to do both builds. >>> >>> However, if we *only* do it on, say, the OS X buildbot, it shouldn't >>> slow things down too much (about 15 minutes), and would probably >>> catch >>> most if not all of the problems with non-pcap builds. >> Funny, I was going to suggest that one of the buildbots build with >> both >> GTK2 and GTK1 1 for the same reason. I agree that only one need do >> it, >> though. >> > So we need with-libpcap and without, with gtk1 or gtk2? > So the Mac OS X buildbot could build > - gtk2 without libpcap > - gtk1 with libpap > (I'm not sure if gtk1 without libpcap makes much sense)...
Yeah, that would cover most of the issues I think. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
