On Feb 28, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > > > Guy Harris wrote: >> bitmus DA wrote: >> >>> i waited and downloaded version 0.99.8 >>> then configured it --without-pcap and compiled. but error still here >> >> That's another bug, not fixed in 0.99.8, but fixed in the current >> SVN, >> so that *particular* fix should be in the next release. >> >> For better or worse, most developers don't build without libpcap, and >> the buildbots don't build without libpcap, so build problems when >> building without libpcap don't tend to get discovered and fixed. >> >> Obviously, we don't want all the buildbots building *only* without >> libpcap. >> >> We could perhaps do all builds first with, and then without, >> libpcap - >> or first without, and then with, libpcap, with post-build tests >> done on >> the versions with libpcap - although that would slow the buildbots >> down >> somewhat. >> >> The Solaris buildbot appears to have taken about 4 3/4 minutes to run >> the configure script, and about 1 hour 38 minutes to do the build, >> unless I'm missing something, so it'd add about 1 3/4 hours to the >> Solaris build procedure to do both builds. >> >> However, if we *only* do it on, say, the OS X buildbot, it shouldn't >> slow things down too much (about 15 minutes), and would probably >> catch >> most if not all of the problems with non-pcap builds. > > Funny, I was going to suggest that one of the buildbots build with > both > GTK2 and GTK1 1 for the same reason. I agree that only one need do > it, > though. > So we need with-libpcap and without, with gtk1 or gtk2? So the Mac OS X buildbot could build - gtk2 without libpcap - gtk1 with libpap (I'm not sure if gtk1 without libpcap makes much sense)...
I can set up another buildbot slave on the same machine (which I'll upgrade to Leopard/Intel soon), but the configure options have to be set by Gerald... > (I thought one of--or the only--reasons that we still supported GTK1 > on > Windows was so the Windows buildbot would test GKT1 builds for us, > but I > don't think that's working as there have been a fair number of times > that I went to build on GTK1/glib1 only to find it broken yet again.) > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-users mailing list > Wireshark-users@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users
