On Friday, May 18, 2018, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On May 18, 2018, at 6:08 PM, Ben Higgins <b...@extrahop.com> wrote: > > > Sounds like it'd still be fine for there to be multiple keylog blocks, > > Yes. > > > but, as you say, they must occur before any packets that require the > secrets contained therein. Is that correct? > > Yes.
Great, thanks. I plan to have us implement this feature accordingly. Should we file a new ticket along these lines or will the existing ticket suffice? ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
