> On 5May 2018, at 10:47, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > That doesn't require "some authority that allocates protocol identifiers", > because it doesn't require protocol identifiers; all that needs to be done is > to allocate pcapng block types to those protocols that require some > additional information to decrypt its traffic.
I like the idea of a "universal" key pcapng block more than requiring each interested protocol to request its own block.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
