On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> 2013/8/12 Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagou...@gmail.com>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > it is now possible to build wireshark with clang (CC=clang ./configure >> && >> > make) (i fix last issue last week end). >> Great news! >> >> > >> > >> > I will try the ASAN feature ( >> > http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html ) >> ASAN is also ported to GCC 4.8. >> I'm not sure which compiler is more reliable regarding ASAN checks, >> though. >> >> ... >> > >> > Also may be now add a clang build to buildbot? (no only scan-build) >> I also wanted to raise the question of adding '-fsanitize=address' to >> the C flags. >> I think fuzzing with ASAN would worth the extra CPU time on buildbots >> and I'm even considering >> turning ASAN on in the Debian packages by default. >> > > ASAN is basically a borrowed subset of valgrind, so fuzzing with ASAN is > not necessary if we can ever get fuzzing with valgrind to work... > > ASAN is only 2x slower (valgrind is 20x slower...) and some bugs is only detect by ASAN... > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
