On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> 2013/8/12 Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagou...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it is now possible to build wireshark with clang (CC=clang ./configure &&
> > make) (i fix last issue last week end).
> Great news!
>
> >
> >
> > I will try the ASAN feature (
> > http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html )
> ASAN is also ported to GCC 4.8.
> I'm not sure which compiler is more reliable regarding ASAN checks, though.
>
> ...
> >
> > Also may be now add a clang build to buildbot? (no only scan-build)
> I also wanted to raise the question of adding '-fsanitize=address'  to
> the C flags.
> I think fuzzing with ASAN would worth the extra CPU time on buildbots
> and I'm even considering
> turning ASAN on in the Debian packages by default.
>

ASAN is basically a borrowed subset of valgrind, so fuzzing with ASAN is
not necessary if we can ever get fuzzing with valgrind to work...
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to