From: <michal.labed...@tieto.com> > I guess current file dissectors are ok (they are only not complete). I > propose start work on Fileshark by write simple file dissector for Wireshark. > You meet dissector API and Wireshark. For example: *.bmp > It sometimes used on webpages, so it is in Wireshark scope. Also you will be > able to add "Preview" to Wireshark (new tab like reassemble tabs? shows only > when click image dissector?).
I'm already familiar with dissector API, so I don't think it would be any problem. I also think that "Preview" feature would be really useful, so I mentioned about it in a comment to my GSoC proposal. > I will be happy to see only one tool, not two separated tools. I hope current > executable can be extended. Keeping Wireshark as one tool would be definitely best solution for me. I think it could be done. > By the way, if you want some help, feel free to contact with me. > > Pozdrawiam / Best regards I've missed this mail previously, so I'm sorry that I'm replying so late. Pozdrawiam, okordy ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
