On Apr 18, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote: > That hadn't even occurred to me; I was thinking more of the fact that > we don't have a separate 'head' structure for reassembly chains and > just assume certain fields are set/unset based on whether the > structure is first in the list or not.
I just made an attempt to clean that up. In the process, I found at least one dissector that assumes that the head structure and the fragment structure look the same, and even some of the freeing code in reassemble.c assumes that. I dropped the attempt in question for now. A from-scratch rewrite might called for here. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
