On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Ambarisha B <b.ambari...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand that feasibility could be a concern in the sense that "we cut > down memory usage without *any* loss in performance* because that would > depend on how well we can tune the cache. I was thinking that the file > backing the tvbuff would be a separate file and not the capture file. In > that case, encryption and compression of capture file wouldn't matter. Am I > missing something here? > On second thoughts, we don't need a separate file for backing up the tvb. But, if the file is compressed etc then the cache misses are going to be more costly. So, I get what you mean't there. Cheers Ambarish
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
