Jeremy Linton wrote: > Jeff Morriss wrote: >> Once Wireshark is up, is it usable [going to Gerald's suggestion]? > > Its a little lagy but usable. I wouldn't want to use it all day long, > but its ok for intermittent use. My feeling is > that its slower than other things running on that machine over X (yast, > xterm, emacs, etc). Those are all pretty usable.
How about some other GTK2 application? My recollection is that GTK2 is pretty talkative (in terms of X traffic). > In those applications the lag is there, but its not bothersome at all. The > ping latencies are fairly fast > > icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.59 ms > icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.409 ms > icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.702 ms > icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.623 ms > icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.967 ms > > > Really what was killing me was the startup time. Weird. I don't know what to make of that. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
