Jeff Morriss wrote:
> Once Wireshark is up, is it usable [going to Gerald's suggestion]?
Its a little lagy but usable. I wouldn't want to use it all day long,
but its ok for intermittent use. My feeling is
that its slower than other things running on that machine over X (yast, xterm,
emacs, etc). Those are all pretty usable.
In those applications the lag is there, but its not bothersome at all. The ping
latencies are fairly fast
icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2.59 ms
icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.409 ms
icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.702 ms
icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.623 ms
icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.967 ms
Really what was killing me was the startup time.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
