I did the clean build again on HP/compaq nc8000 with 0.99.6 source
I unzip the source under c:\wireshark-0.99.6
Here are some modifications I did.
1. config.nmake MSVC_VARIANT=MSVC2005EE
2. dos2unix win32-setup.sh win32-setup.shc (my cygwin use unix line
convention)
3. Use full path such as "c:/WINNT/system32/xcopy" to replace xcopy in if
statement of Makefile.nmake

Then the build,
nmake -f Makefile.nmake verify_tools
nmake -f Makefile.nmake setup to update the c:\wireshark-win32-libs
nmake -f Makefile.nmake distclean
nmake -f Makefile.nmake all

During the build there is only one annoying thing. The nmake failed
sometime, complaining "xxx is not a reconized ...". Then what I need to do
is run the "nmake -f Makefile.nmake all" again.

Hope this will help. I didn't have the problem you had. One thing I noticed
is I have
verion .762 of Program Maintenance Utility, but you have .42

nmake -f Makefile.nmake verify_tools

Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 8.00.50727.762
Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.

Checking for required applications:
        cl: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 8/VC/BIN/cl
        link: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio
8/VC/BIN/link
        nmake: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio
8/VC/BIN/nmake

Thanks,
/Yin


On 8/24/07, Greg Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm assuming when I do the verify_tools step, it confirms that I'm using
> nmake/cl/link from VS8 based on the output:
>
> C:\wireshark>nmake -f Makefile.nmake verify_tools
> Microsoft (R) Program Maintenance Utility Version 8.00.50727.42
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.
> Checking for required applications:
>         cl: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio 8/VC/BIN/cl
>         link: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio
> 8/VC/BIN/link
>         nmake: /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Visual Studio
> 8/VC/BIN/nmake
>         bash: /usr/bin/bash
>         ............
>
> *yin sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote:
>
> the wiki page suggest you ONLY use nmake/cl/link from VS8 (true name of
> Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition),
> but make sure NOT use nmake/cl/link from 2003 server SDK R2 under windows
> 2000.
>
> Hope this will help.
>
> /Yin
>
> On 8/22/07, Graham Bloice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Greg Bell wrote:
> > > I guess if I used VS 6.0, I wouldn't need Platform SDK 2003 as its
> > > already integrated in the 6.0 compiler package. To use 6.0, I would
> > > need to prepare cmd.exe by calling
> > > "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\VC98\Bin\vcvars32.bat"
> > > instead of
> > > "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\bin\vcvars32.bat"
> > > correct?
> > Yes.  You also need to make changes to config.nmake to indicate the use
> > of VC6.
> > >
> > > This would still not resolve the issue with VC 2005 EE and Platform
> > > SDK 2003 R3. I'm surprised this is not a common problem among other
> > > Wireshark developers; do people just not use (or test on) Windows 2000
> > > anymore?
> > >
> > I guess folks are:
> >
> > a) Using a combination of EE and SDK that works on W2K
> > b) Not testing/using on W2K
> > c) Using VS2005 Pro or better with a different SDK.
> >
> > We have had several threads in the past few months with this issue, but
> > no-one who has had the issue has stayed the course until we resolved it.
> >
> >
> > You may want to buck the trend!
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Graham Bloice
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireshark-dev mailing list
> > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel 
> today!<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48517/*http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to