Maynard, Chris wrote: > Hmm, I'm not sure he meant that, especially since Richard's follow-up > (http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/200708/msg00432.html) > indicated that he wanted me to send patches for each one. > > I am basically going down the alphabet here, tediously looking for > display filter fields that don't look right, then fixing them as I go. > I'm only on 'C' at the moment, so this is going to take awhile before > I'm done.
I don't think we'd realised you were going to do every dissector! As you suggest, some sort of compromise is probably best... Cheers, Rich _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
