>On 9/25/06, ronnie sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Are these zero length constructs actually allowed by the standard? >> >> If they are not it might be better to just abort dissection completely >> with a "[malformed packet]" message.
>I honestly do not know if the standard allows for that, however, >I do not agree with aborting dissection en tout. I believe that if we >can decode it we should, but an error label (expert info) should be >added to the item. > >Luis If I remeber correctly the "BER" standard allows zero lengt SEQUENCE and SEQUENCE OF, I'm haven't checked if the H.248 standard says anything on the subject. It looks though like an "unusual" implementation :) Brg Anders
<<winmail.dat>>
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
