all that H.248 says about sequences is: NOTE 2 – The ASN.1 specification below contains a clause defining TerminationIDList as a sequence of TerminationIDs. The length of this sequence SHALL be one, except possibly when used in contextAuditResult.
Is that our case? Luis. On 9/25/06, Anders Broman (AL/EAB) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >On 9/25/06, ronnie sahlberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Are these zero length constructs actually allowed by the standard? > >> > >> If they are not it might be better to just abort dissection completely > >> with a "[malformed packet]" message. > > >I honestly do not know if the standard allows for that, however, > >I do not agree with aborting dissection en tout. I believe that if we > >can decode it we should, but an error label (expert info) should be > >added to the item. > > > >Luis > > If I remeber correctly the "BER" standard allows zero lengt SEQUENCE and > SEQUENCE OF, I'm haven't checked if the H.248 standard > says anything on the subject. > It looks though like an "unusual" implementation :) > > Brg > Anders > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
