On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 12:41 +0100, Peter Davies wrote: > > Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first > > fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large > > percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword. > > A FIXME doesn't neccesarily indicate a stub. It sometimes is like > "Flag FOO unsupported", which is not the same as a stub. Maybe we > could have STUB macro to be called in stub functions.
Sure, we would overestimate the number of stubs a little but I don't think we need such accurate statistics, it's certainly not worth the addition of a new macro. You could even catch most of those false positives by ignoring fixmes which are preceded by a trace.
