On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:25 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote: > Just to confirm what André said, if the FIXME does not contain the word > 'stub', then apistats has no way to know it's a (pseudo-)stub.
Wouldn't it be sufficient for our purposes to just count every first fixme in a WINAPI function as a stub? As it is now there's a large percentage of fixmes that don't include the 'stub' keyword. > I would further argue that even a human reading the log would have no > way to know as quite a few implemented functions still dump their parameters. > So even for humans it's better to add 'stub' to the FIXME message. I'd say we need turn those into traces and add fixmes for the unimplemented parts, if needed.
