Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> writes: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> > wrote: >> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> writes: >> >>> so - what do people think? would you agree that a user-space pipe >>> "proxy" is an effective solution? >> >> No, you are on the wrong track. That solution is ugly, inefficient, and >> it doesn't help anything since the wineserver constraints that you are >> trying to avoid obviously apply just as well to your proxy process. > > how would you envisage doing client-side SMB named pipes?
By doing the I/O through the wineserver. It has all the necessary mechanisms already. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
