Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> writes: > i would imagine that inefficient is the _last_ thing on the list of > priorities. "technically correctly fulfilling the semantics" i would > imagine would be the highest priority. > > "efficient" and "nice" can always be done later, yes?
No, in many cases efficiency needs to be taken into account in the design phase. You can't just add it later. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
