Hi Jeremy,
> Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:49:37 -0500> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL > PROTECTED]> CC: [email protected]> Subject: Re: Right way to cope with > user error in make test?> > Hi Alistair,> > > This could be a good option. > libxslt should properly be non-optional> > since msxml3 relys on it.> > > > > From the Makefile.in, its appears to have linked to libxslt for quite some > > > time,> > but was never an issue since it was never used.> > > > Francois > Gouget raised this bug,> > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035> > > that libslt should be dynamic, which could be another option.> > I think in > my case the problem is a bit different; I have the library -> what I don't > have are the development headers. Thus the linking all> works, but > HAVE_LIBXSLT is not defined, so the transform function> ends up as a stub, > and goes on to fail.> > And I still don't know a right answer.> > The > attached patch is one approach - skip the tests in this case.> > Does this > seem like a reasonable approach to folks?> Looks good to me. Best Regards Alistair Leslie-Hughes _________________________________________________________________ Search for local singles online @ Lavalife - Click here http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Flavalife9%2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%26context%3Dan99%26locale%3Den%5FAU%26a%3D30290&_t=764581033&_r=email_taglines_Search_OCT07&_m=EXT
