On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Edward Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x > > and 1.0.x) style releases for development? > > We will, actually. What made you think we wouldn't? > Is http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleasePlan poorly written? > > 1.1.x will be our trunk during the 1.1 era. > We may or may not have development on the 1.0 branch; > depends on if there's demand and volunteer manpower. > - Dan >
If 1.1.0 is set to be released two weeks after 1.0, then we may need to adjust the target milestones in bugzilla for some of them. I doubt, for instance, that a DIB engine will be implemented in a that time. -Austin (Sorry for the dupe Dan, hit the wrong button).
