Edward Savage wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The 1.1.x releases will be development releases, >> so a 1.1.0 milestone doesn't make much sense. >> Please create a 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla. >> Thanks! >> - Dan >> >> > > Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x > and 1.0.x) style releases for development? > > Most foss applications seem to have moved away from the even odd > release cycle and due to wines long lead times between releases having > it this way could get rather confusing for newer users not expecting > it. > > Edward > > Ps Sorry for the dupe dan, hit the wrong button. > > >
As far as I'm aware, 1.2.0 will be a long time off (as would 1.1.0) it's just the next _big_ milestone. He doesn't mean that after 1.0.0 there wont be anything before 1.1.0. It's just a point to aim to fix the main bugs by. Ben H.
