As I understood it when we were signing off the organizational strategy, we set up a separate legal entity to manage/own QRpedia so that WMUK would not have to be responsible. Considering the significant number of non-Wikimedia GLAM organizations that have invested in this QR technology on the presumption that QRpedia will be a reliable and simple mobile service, we may be overdue properly to unhook QR Pedia from the local UK chapter and instead make it a separate international GLAM organization with funding from more diverse sources.
Should WMUK be diverted to other things, or say, end up having no staff to handle GLAM outreach or coordinate on technical problems, then the board of QRpedia should be free to have their own GLAM-stakeholder-agreed support plans which may be dependent on the WMF and its funding, or not. Thanks for chipping away at this Andy. When the handful of us involved in the set up are no longer following QRpedia issues, I suspect it would remain submerged permanently below the waterline. Cheers, Fae On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 11:18, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: > > It seems that there are still issues with QRpedia: > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T210050 > > Can we have some input from WMUK, about the likelihood of a fix, please? > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: https://wikimedia.org.uk
