I've been trying to make those points myself, but I've given up now...
On 9 Apr 2013 17:39, "Lodewijk" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> on this talk 
> page<http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:EGM_2013/Resolutions#Alternatives_to_Resolution_regarding_the_composition_of_the_board>
>  I
> have asked some questions regarding the goals and purpose of the resolution
> proposed, and what problem exactly it is trying to solve. I also tried to
> understand better what alternatives have been investigated (personally I
> find the proposed solution a bit strong as a first thought, so I am
> assuming less far reaching alternatives were seriously given consideration
> to solve the same problem).
>
> I may have missed part of the discussions, so would appreciate any help in
> filling the gaps in reasoning at that page.
>
> Also a more technical question: would it still be possible to pass
> alternative resolutions (for example, were the board-proposed resolution to
> be rejected)? Or has the term for that been passed and would you have to
> wait until the next General Meeting for that?
>
> Apologies that I didn't ask these questions in a much earlier stage - I do
> hope and assume someone else did and the answer can simply be copy pasted.
> Placing the answers on the linked talk page would be most helpful (rather
> than starting off a discussion here).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Lodewijk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia UK mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to