Thanks for the clarification on that.
2013/4/9 Richard Symonds <[email protected]> > I'm speaking as an EGM teller here: > > [W]ould it still be possible to pass alternative resolutions (for example, >> were the board-proposed resolution to be rejected)? Or has the term for >> that been passed and would you have to wait until the next General Meeting >> for that? > > > It's not possible to pass alternative resolutions at the EGM > unfortunately. Any new resolutions would have to be tabled at the AGM in > June 2013. > > > Richard Symonds > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0992 > > Wikimedia UK is a Company Limited by Guarantee registered in England and > Wales, Registered No. 6741827. Registered Charity No.1144513. Registered > Office 4th Floor, Development House, 56-64 Leonard Street, London EC2A 4LT. > United Kingdom. Wikimedia UK is the UK chapter of a global Wikimedia > movement. The Wikimedia projects are run by the Wikimedia Foundation (who > operate Wikipedia, amongst other projects). > > *Wikimedia UK is an independent non-profit charity with no legal control > over Wikipedia nor responsibility for its contents.* > > > On 9 April 2013 17:38, Lodewijk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> on this talk >> page<http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:EGM_2013/Resolutions#Alternatives_to_Resolution_regarding_the_composition_of_the_board> >> I >> have asked some questions regarding the goals and purpose of the resolution >> proposed, and what problem exactly it is trying to solve. I also tried to >> understand better what alternatives have been investigated (personally I >> find the proposed solution a bit strong as a first thought, so I am >> assuming less far reaching alternatives were seriously given consideration >> to solve the same problem). >> >> I may have missed part of the discussions, so would appreciate any help >> in filling the gaps in reasoning at that page. >> >> Also a more technical question: would it still be possible to pass >> alternative resolutions (for example, were the board-proposed resolution to >> be rejected)? Or has the term for that been passed and would you have to >> wait until the next General Meeting for that? >> >> Apologies that I didn't ask these questions in a much earlier stage - I >> do hope and assume someone else did and the answer can simply be copy >> pasted. Placing the answers on the linked talk page would be most helpful >> (rather than starting off a discussion here). >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Lodewijk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia UK mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l >> WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
