It is clear that the board protected Roger. It is not clear that they did so because of an overfamiliarity among the board. I think they probably thought they were just being supportive colleagues. On Oct 8, 2012 10:36 AM, "Gordon Joly" <gordon.j...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On 08/10/12 10:35, David Gerard wrote: > >> On 8 October 2012 09:09, Andy Mabbett <pigsotw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Oct 7, 2012 8:24 PM, "Gordon Joly" <gordon.j...@pobox.com> wrote: >>> >>>> It seems clear that being friends allows a group to protect an >>>> individual, >>>> when that person (e.g. Roger Bamkin) should asked to consider his >>>> position. >>>> It appears that he was protected. >>>> >>> You've obviously seen some evidence that the rest of us have not. Perhaps >>> it's time you shared that with us. >>> >> >> +1 >> >> Gordon, you've been called on unsubstantiated sniping before. If you >> have something to say, say it. >> >> >> - d. >> > > Did the board reject Roger's resignations in the past? > > > Gordo > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikimedia UK mailing list > wikimediau...@wikimedia.org > http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l<http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l> > WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
