On Sep 20, 2012 4:27 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, James Farrar <james.far...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2012 12:21 PM, "Andreas Kolbe" <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Regardless of whether there is impropriety or not, it is hardly
possible to claim that the appearance of impropriety has been avoided.
>>
>> For someone in the public eye, no matter how properly they behave, a
person with an axe to grind can always spin an appearance of impropriety.
>
>
>
> "The self-promotional aspect here (the degree to which MonmouthpediAis
clearly used by Roger has a way to advance his personal career) is real and
somewhat unsavory. Serving on a board of a non-profit oughtto be done first
and foremost to serve that organization's objectives,not to promote
separate business goals."
>
> – Erik Möller, September 19, 2012
>
>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2012-September/122066.html

Sad that someone so high in the movement would fall for the soon of those
who want to destroy it.

>> And let's say Roger does resign: who's the next target on your list?
>
>
>
> That is simply nonsense.

No, it isn't.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to