On 18 June 2012 17:44, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 June 2012 15:28, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> > wrote: >> No amount of corporate jargon and/or penny-pinching can cover up not >> getting the right person for the job because the position is a vaguish >> proposition. So I think Tom has a point. > > I don't think the problem is a vague position. It's our first tech > hire, so the job is to do all our tech work.
All WMUK's existing tech work, or all in prospect. I'm a week into a job that might require tech support, such as deciding how to host a LAMP program within WMUK's hosting, which (as I understand) was or is being changed. I know less than most people on this list in this area; but if you advertise for a handyperson, that is what you'll get. And without certain skills, a new project may require a new person or contractor. In any case there was a job spec set out 18 months ago, I recall. Charles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list wikimediau...@wikimedia.org http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
