On 6 January 2012 16:00, Charles Matthews <[email protected]> wrote: > It's certainly a big deal for WMUK. Sue's position could have been > anticipated, by anyone who keeps up with the Signpost, for example. I'm in > two minds myself.
Sue's position has been reasonably clear since Haifa, but it hasn't been in keeping with the board's position (the letter they sent round while in Haifa sets out clear criteria for chaptesr to fundraise and they aren't impossible criterea to meet so they clearly intended for that to be an option). My concern is that the board will be split and they'll end up defaulting to accepting the recommendations of the ED rather than having to make a decision of their own... _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org
