Hello, About my experiences with Chat CPT - is it good enough to write our articles? - I made this video: https://youtu.be/zKPEyxYt5kg Kind regards Ziko
Am Di., 20. Dez. 2022 um 20:25 Uhr schrieb Pharos <[email protected]>: > > I'd like to share my experiment with using ChapGPT to help write an article > on English Wikipedia: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artwork_title > > You can see an explanation of the process here, your comments are welcome: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Artwork_title#Use_of_ChatGPT > > Thanks, > Richard > (User:Pharos) > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 1:45 PM ZhaoFJx <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'd be curious about copyright issues though, as it's licensed on Github. It >> may indeed be infringing copyright, since he may require attribution. >> However, I agree with The Cunctator that the community won't do anything >> about it. >> >> Incidentally, I'm a little worried that he might grab broken content that >> wasn't rolled back. After all - the current artificial intelligence can not >> reach the level of human thinking >> >> Sincerely, >> ZhaoFJx >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l >> >> Anders Wennersten <[email protected]> 于2022年12月19日周一 08:52写道： >>> >>> I think we should not underestimate what this could evolve into. We thrived >>> because our readers find us "good enough" when it comes to finding facts, >>> not the ultimate source. >>> >>> And the software learns by reading, and can (and have done so) Wikipedia, >>> Wikidata etc and represent our data in its own syntax och present it in a >>> way so it is not a direct copy. Perhaps data will be a bit delayed to the >>> actual content in Wikipedia, but so what - good enough? >>> >>> Anders >>> >>> Den 2022-12-19 kl. 14:26, skrev Gnangarra: >>> >>> AI simply cant descriminate between good research and faked research, for >>> any outcome it must provide all of its sources whether they are from >>> Wikipedia, Wikidata, WikiCommons, WikiSource or some other place. >>> Otherwise it will answer yes to some asking if the world is flat because >>> it'll seek out that answer and find all the nonsense that has been produced. >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 06:02, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 5:55 AM Anders Wennersten >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > ChatGPT is now making headlines more or less every day and I perceive >>>> > them to try to position themself av the "next" google. >>>> >>>> I suspect OpenAI will continue to focus on generative applications >>>> (images, code, text for purposes such as copywriting, eventually >>>> music/video) and won't attempt to compete with Google directly, but >>>> we'll see. Currently GPT-3.5 (which ChatGPT is based on) is very prone >>>> to generating nonsensical answers, citations to works that don't >>>> exist, etc. But it is pretty cool if you keep its limitations in >>>> mind--for example, it's quite good at bootstrapping small scripts in >>>> various programming languages (with mistakes and idiosyncrasies). >>>> >>>> Google has one of the largest AI research programs on the planet, they >>>> just are extremely conservative about letting anyone try their models >>>> (due to reputational concerns, e.g., that generative AI will spit out >>>> racist output within about 30 seconds of people poking its >>>> guardrails). This blog post from September is instructive about the >>>> direction they're taking with what's called retrieval-augmented >>>> generation; see the paper linked from the post for details: >>>> >>>> https://www.deepmind.com/blog/building-safer-dialogue-agents (DeepMind >>>> is part of Google) >>>> >>>> That is likely to yield significantly more accurate answers than what >>>> ChatGPT is doing, and is difficult to replicate for folks like OpenAI >>>> without being dependent on the search APIs of big search companies. >>>> It's worth noting that Google has also started to incorporate language >>>> model tooling into how it's presenting search results (e.g., >>>> summarizing or highlighting different parts of a website to make the >>>> result snippet more useful). >>>> >>>> A retrieval-augmented approach that leverages Wikidata could IMO be >>>> quite powerful and could be a useful research program for Wikimedia to >>>> pursue, be it independently or in partnership with others. The >>>> resulting technology should of course be fully open source. >>>> >>>> Querying Wikidata via SPARQL is currently still a bit of wizardry (and >>>> the query builder is extremely limited). To pick a completely random >>>> example not at all inspired by current events, if I wanted to see a >>>> list of journalists with Mastodon accounts & a picture, I currently >>>> have to do this: >>>> >>>> SELECT DISTINCT ?personLabel ?mastodonName ?pic >>>> WHERE { >>>> ?person wdt:P4033 ?mastodonName ; >>>> wdt:P106 ?occupation . >>>> OPTIONAL { ?person wdt:P18 ?pic . } >>>> ?occupation wdt:P279* wd:Q1930187 . >>>> SERVICE wikibase:label { >>>> bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en" >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>> Make a small mistake (a curly brace missing) and you'll get a red >>>> error message. Forgot the * after wdt:P279? A different response set >>>> in ways that are difficult to spot or reason about. >>>> >>>> Why can't I type "list of journalists with their picture and Mastodon >>>> account" as a natural language query? (You can try it in ChatGPT and >>>> it'll get you started, but it'll generate nonsense P/Q numbers.) If >>>> such queries could be produced reliably, it could be a very useful >>>> tool for readers as well. >>>> >>>> Warmly, >>>> Erik >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines >>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l >>>> Public archives at >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/YYTLJVCDSYITUKNA2DJSK5SSR3AZ3B5F/ >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Boodarwun >>> Gnangarra >>> 'ngany dabakarn koorliny arn boodjera dardoon ngalang Nyungar koortaboodjar' >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l >>> Public archives at >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/CVXPECMNLGBGIQYP2DI7IRJVLUNNOF6B/ >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l >>> Public archives at >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/HKAPIBPSXAETLTFQFQDPDCSGCFWDCXAQ/ >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> >> >> >> -- >> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l >> Public archives at >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/ALV3QLKTB7RWCCR5W4HNDA4ZDG5ARRDC/ >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l >> Public archives at >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/ZRVVJ3WVSB2VKRD5MQYILZYHLVZBMSQO/ >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > Public archives at > https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/UI6THQHUMH7SQLHDA4JUI7FOCXIYXGXI/ > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/N5AZFZIZSR5GOBRXCMX4FEBBFGCFBWPJ/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
